Is civil society becoming extinct?

By Anthony GOMES

 

THROUGHOUT the world, civil society is disappearing and being replaced by violence of all descriptions and brutality of the worst kind.   Apart from the cultural coarsening of civil society, whether they include violent street protests.  engaging the police at one end of the spectrum, or civil war fuelled by sectarian lifestyle differences, the planet again faces the possibility of world conflagration.

The humanitarian tragedy of Syria, the Boko Haram Islamic uprising in Nigeria, the sabre-rattling aggression of North Korea, the unwinnable Afghanistan campaign, the neutralising of al-Qaeda in Yemen, the intense cultural differences between Sunni and Shea in Iraq, the interventions by Iran in Iraq and Lebanon by Hezbollah, and incursions by al-Qaeda in Mali, Algeria and Libya all began with inaccurate Western intelligence regarding the presence of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), that were never found.  Theey were recently believed to be stored in Syria, mainly consisting of chemical weapons, and used, according to France and the EU, against the Syrian rebel cohorts.  Let us also not forget the struggle in Pakistan against the al-Qaeda Taliban.   Being a nuclear power with a well-stocked atomic arsenal, Pakistan is of serious concern to the Western powers, lest atomic weapons were to fall into the hands of the Taliban.

As described above, there is no denying that the deadly plague of terrorism is spreading beyond all borders, in the name of Islam.   In recent years al-Qaeda has suffered heavy losses resulting from drone strikes that regrettably have a high rate of collateral damage, which has made them a very unpopular offensive weapon.  The al-Qaeda magazine Inspire has revealed their newly devised strategy that calls for home-grown individual jihadists, who have been radicalised to carry out attacks, mostly on "soft" targets; similar to the Boston bombings, the murder of the young Fusilier in London, and the latest shootings with the resemblance of an al-Qaeda operation in Santa Monica, US, that is yet to be confirmed.  The Western Christian powers are still considering how to deal with this new offensive self-sacrificing run of events.

Since the end of WW II, the faith and morals of the Christian West have undergone serious diminution in the cause of social freedom, sovereignty, and fuelled by secularism that has given new intepretation to what is right or wrong.   Traditions and other cultural norms have been tested in the legal and ecclesiastical domains, widening the meaning of "truth" to embrace influential factors of human rights, gender and race, all of which have spawned pernicious arguments, which may be termed "modern" jurisprudence.   In colloquial language: "One can do no wrong," if you can afford a skilled defender.

These liberalised modern statutes represent a departure from what was considered normal or accepted, or regarded as right.  This new-founded attitude has given rise to open disobedience that challenges all the rules of the historic social establishment which, in too many cases, ends up in tragedy.  The sinister characteristics can be seen in the murder of innocents, the aged, decapitations, abortion, and euthanasia, to list some of the more common acts that stalk the "land we love".   The defenders of human rights from abroad find it difficult to grasp the multiple and brutal murders that occupy the pages and waves of our media.  They find it difficult to understand why capital punishment is appropriate in such indescribable assaults on human kind.  This mindset is due, in part, to the landmark case of Ruth Ellis, which changed the previously held attitude to capital punishment in the UK.

In 1955, in Britain, the practice of capital punishment encountered a major challenge which resulted in the mandatory requirement for the death penalty in capital cases being removed.  Until then, there was strong support for the application of the death penalty, dictated by the law at that time.  However, with the landmark case of Ruth Ellis, a 28-year-old young woman born in North Wales on 9th October 1925, who was the last woman to be hanged on 13th July 1955 at Her Majesty's woman's prison, Holloway, in London.  Her case was one of premeditated murder to which she confessed, and, according to public opinion, would have been classified in this century as a "crime passionelle" that warranted life imprisonment.  She was executed by Albert Pierrepoint, a member of the historically famous family of executioners.   The event caused a fundamental change in public opinion that has reshaped contemporary jurisdiction in the UK.

Since then, Western societies have witnessed a raft of dramatic liberalisations which have changed the current social lifestyles across the Western hemisphere from same-sex unions to rampant multiple shootings of innocent civilians and schoolchildren, due to the easy possession of powerful military-type firearms which, in the case of the US, is enshrined in the Second Amendment of their constitution and relentlessly upheld by the powerful National Rifle Association.

The cost of maintaining the new-found liberalised lifestyle comes at a high price, with many deserving malevolent souls walking free, given the present complex system of proving guilt due to the monumental earnings in circulation from the drugs trade, and the threatened reprisals against the families of witnesses that form the themes of the nightly television stories that are becoming more realistic as time goes by.

May we be guided to calmer waters by the prayers of the faithful.

June 12, 2013

Jamaica Observer

Islamophobia - A brewing 'Cold War' in the US and the Caribbean

By Rebecca Theodore

Ever since the Runnymede Trust of 1997 made Islamophobia a household name, the usage of the word has spread like wildfire throughout the developed world.   Cemented on the slates of history as a barbaric, primitive and sexist political ideology that supports terrorism, monolithic in origin and does not possess values common with other cultures; Islamophobia is now fulfilling the ideological role that anti-communism served in the Cold War era from which to understand the world.

Although it is the belief of political scientists and sociologists in the US that it was the 9/11 attacks that continues to confirm Islam as “enemy” with destructive clarity, the myth that perpetuate all Muslims as terrorists compressed with the hysteria and outpouring of hate for Islam and Muslims has never been more evident than by the incidence of Koran burning and the debacle over the building of a Muslim community center near Ground Zero.

It follows that if “nothing is more dangerous than the influence of private interests on public affairs” then the way in which the media continues to dehumanize Muslims not only detaches the issue away from its socio-political context, but the “CNN effect” hypothesis, which continues to imply that the media is more influential in shaping policies since the cessation of the Cold War, enforces the culture of victimhood against Muslims and vividly demonstrate that Islamophobia is a one-stop cause for the myriad of problems facing the world today, when in essence it is only a human and technological construct -- an aggressive television sound-bite, that does not exist in time and space.

It is now clear that the finalization of the Cold War now brings a greater focus upon alternative enemies and the portrayal of the binary ‘other’ as a new Cold War is not taking place with socio-economic factors, but with great partition among humankind, hence a dominating cultural conflict that now carries the potency of a blockade mentality, that fuels more antagonism and bitterness and making Muslim communities more inward looking and more open to religious extremism.

In the same way the Holocaust revealed how ferociously unchanged beneath the veneer of civilization lurks the old bête human (human beast) and how moral progress can be stamped by a Darwinian-Malthusian conflict model embedded in intellectual thinking, hostility towards Islam justifies Muslims as “Successor to the Berlin Wall”, thus the buildup hysteria against the Muslim community and their exclusion from mainstream society.  On this assumption, it is impossible to encode the lives of Muslims in Darwinian-Malthusian genetics because the dogma holds no clues for human conduct, no answers to human moral dilemmas and in my view is the most potent intellectual force that is presently eroding the West’s traditional moral order by glorifying ideas of discriminatory practices towards Muslims and confers approval on discrimination as a biological necessity and in this way anti-Islamism is normalized.

As images are important in constructing the discourses of everyday life, the politics of the veil and hatred and abuse of Muslims is exaggerated to suit politicians and journalistic needs in the US and the world at large.   Inflating anti-Muslim prejudice is useful for mainstream politicians to draw attention to themselves and to make monetary gains.   TV personalities, intellectuals, newsworthy Islamophobes, politicians, bestsellers with melodramatic titles by unknown authors with no knowledge of Muslim history are frenziedly defining the dangerous ‘other’ in western society, with no regard to Muslim families who are presently facing a crisis of individuality and freedom in their explanation of the impasse to the younger generation.

Being sensitive to Islamophobia allows politicians to reclaim honorable high ground lost in political mauling over the war in Iraq and Afghanistan.  The latest of several controversial remarks by Nevada Republican US Senate candidate Sharron Angle that the country needs to address a "militant terrorist situation" that has allowed Islamic religious law to take hold in American cities like Dearborn, Michigan, and Frankford, Texas, strongly indicate that Islamophobia is not limited to the textual, but can be understood with reference to fields of visuality in politics and shows a terrifying lack of connection with reality and that there is big money to be made in promoting bigotry against Muslims.

In the Caribbean, Islam plays a prominent role in Caribbean history, stretching back over one thousand years and tracing its presence to the Atlantic slave trade, the influx of refugees caused by the Spanish persecution of non-Christians in Spain, resulting in Muslims fleeing a ravaged Ottoman Empire in search of opportunities, Arab refugees fleeing persecution by Jews in Palestine, and also Muslim Indians, both indentured servants and immigrants seeking a better way of life.  Regardless of the origin of the Islamic presence, it has endured and is currently growing with a Caribbean Islamic Secretariat playing a prominent role in politics and education and catering to economic development within the business community.

Moreover, new research reveals evidence leading to the presence of Muslims in the ancient Americas long before Columbus’ destructive interference in the fifteenth century.  What is significant about the Islamic presence in the Caribbean is that it has survived for so long.  Alex Haley in his book “Roots” realistically reconstructs the story of his Muslim ancestor Kunta Kinte, who was kidnapped, sold and transported to the Americas, thus showing attempts made by slaves to cling to their Islamic culture and heritage, proving that hostility towards Islam stems from the atrocities and cultural genocide perpetrated by ‘pseudo civilized’ European colonizers in their scathing mission of the cross and the sword and bringing light to the heathens.

Forthwith, in 1848, Karl Marx began his Communist Manifesto with the famous words: “A specter is haunting Europe – the specter of communism.”   Today, another specter is haunting the world.   It is the specter of a brewing Cold War against Islam.

November 3, 2010

caribbeannewsnow