Does The Haitian Constitution Trumps The Bahamian Constitution in The Bahamas

DOES THE HAITIAN CONSTITUTION TRUMPS OUR BAHAMIAN CONSTITUTION?

From Speak Up Bahamas:

I’m trying to understand something… and maybe someone can explain it logically.  Why are some Bahamians now arguing that the Haitian Constitution is more powerful than the Bahamian Constitution?

The Haitian Constitution says that once you are born to a Haitian parent — whether mother or father — you are Haitian, and that citizenship cannot be renounced.

But let’s be very clear… We are in The Bahamas, governed by OUR Constitution.  The Bahamian Constitution clearly states that if a Bahamian married to a Haitian woman, and they have a child, that child is Bahamian — with the full rights of a Bahamian, including the right to vote, and it doesnt mattter how fluent they are in the English language.

So the real question is: Which Constitution governs The Bahamas?  Are we seriously saying that a foreign constitution can override our own laws, our own sovereignty, and our own identity as a nation?

That would mean we are no longer in control of our country — and that simply cannot be the case.

You cannot pick and choose when to respect the Bahamian Constitution and when to ignore it.

This is not about emotion, politics, or division — this is about law, sovereignty, and national identity.

Bahamians must decide:

👉 Do we stand on OUR Constitution?

👉 Or are we now allowing foreign laws to dictate who is Bahamian and who can vote?  Make it make sense.

Speak Up Bahamas. 🇧🇸

Source / Comment

Bahamian Constitutional Attorney - Craig Butler, Esq., Answers:

I’m answering the question and authoritatively so:

👉🏽 I’m the constitutional expert.

 

👉🏽 if you think you’re smart take me on Peter.

The Bahamian Constitution governs The Bahamas.  Full stop.

No foreign constitution overrides it, dictates it, or displaces it.

But that is not the real issue here.

The confusion is coming from a failure to understand how citizenship actually operates in law.

There are multiple pathways:

• Citizenship by descent (through a Bahamian parent)

• Citizenship by birth with entitlement to apply (e.g., persons born in The Bahamas to non-Bahamian parents applying at 18–19)

• Registration and naturalisation

So when people raise the Haitian Constitution, they are not saying it overrides Bahamian law.  They are pointing to the fact that another country may also recognize that person as its citizen.

That creates dual nationality issues, not constitutional supremacy issues.

And here is the key point many are missing:

A child born in The Bahamas to Haitian parents does not automatically become Bahamian.  They have a constitutional right to apply for citizenship between ages 18 and 19.

Many have exercised that right. Lawfully.

Once granted, they are Bahamian citizens—under our Constitution.

So let’s not distort this.

This is not about Haiti overriding The Bahamas.  This is about people misunderstanding:

• how citizenship is acquired,

• how dual nationality arises, and

• how our own Constitution actually works.

If there are concerns about abuse of the system, then address enforcement and administration.

But do not invent a constitutional conflict that does not exist.

Source / Comment

Political Issues in The Bahamas

Politics in The Bahamas

THE BAHAMAS: ELECTORAL REALITY, HISTORICAL STRUGGLE, AND THE WORK AHEAD

Saturday, 4 April 2026

4:07 PM Eastern Standard Time

Nassau, The Bahamas

By Craig F. Butler, Esq.

Today marks 58 years since the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in Memphis, Tennessee — 4 April 1968.

He was killed standing on a balcony.

But what he represented was never killed.

Because the struggle he spoke to — dignity, justice, legitimacy, and the structure of power — did not end in Memphis.

It continues.

And we must be honest enough to say:

It continues here.

I. THE CONTINUITY OF STRUGGLE

We like to think of the African struggle as something external — something that happened “over there,” in America, in South Africa, in the streets of history.

But we are confronting our own version of that struggle right here in The Bahamas.

Not in the same form.

Not with the same violence.

But with the same underlying question:

👉 Who controls power?

👉 How is that power exercised?

👉 And who benefits from it?

II. THE PRESENT MOMENT — EMOTION VS LAW

Right now, the country is agitated.

People are speaking about:

• the voters’ register

• citizenship concerns

• passports

• electoral integrity

• governance and spending

And much of that concern is real.

But we must separate two things:

what is emotionally compelling

and, what is constitutionally possible.

III. THE LEGAL REALITY🇧🇸🇧🇸

Let me state this plainly and finally:

👉 The Prime Minister has exercised the prerogative to dissolve Parliament.

👉 The House is prorogued.

👉 The election is called.

That power is spent.

It is not reversible by public pressure.

It is not undone by commentary.

It is not halted by applications that do not meet constitutional threshold.

So let the Bahamian public understand clearly:

There is nothing — short of war, catastrophic disaster, or a true national emergency — that is going to stop the general election scheduled for 12 May 2026.

Not the courts.

Not politics.

Not outrage.

IV. THE HARD TRUTH

We have been talking about these issues for years.

Not one election.

Not two.

Multiple election cycles.

The voters’ register concerns are not new.  Citizenship questions are not new.  Administrative weaknesses are not new.

They are systemic.

So let us stop pretending that this moment created the problem.

It did not.

V. THE REAL ISSUE🇧🇸🇧🇸

This is where the country must mature.

The election is going forward.

👉 Votes will be cast

👉 Results will be declared

👉 A government will be sworn in

That is going to happen.

So the real question is no longer:  “Can we stop this election?”

The real question is:

👉 Why have we allowed this issue to persist for so long?

👉 And what are we going to do to fix it after the election?

VI. THE DANGER

Too many of our people are locked into budget politics:

- Who gets contracts

- Who controls spending

- Who distributes the billion dollars

That is not governance.  That is access to power disguised as democracy.

And until we confront that honestly, we will continue to recycle the same problems.

VII. THE WAY FORWARD

If we are serious, the work is clear:

• structural reform of the registration system

• modernization and digitization

• legal accountability where wrongdoing exists

• continuous audit — not election-time outrage

• and sustained national discipline beyond party politics

Because shouting at the moment of election will never fix a problem that has been growing for decades.

VIII. CLOSING

Dr. King fought for justice, but more importantly, he fought for structure — for a system that could sustain dignity, not just promise it.

That is the lesson.

Not emotion.  Not outrage.

Structure.

So let us be clear:

👉 This election is happening.

👉 These problems are not new.

👉 And the real work begins after the vote, not before it.

Because if we do not fix the system, we will be right back here again.

With Professional Respect Asé

CRAIG F. BUTLER ESQ.

Constitutional Theorist

Pan-African Methodology

Commonwealth of The Bahamas

Source / Comment

Why did the British Empire Collapsed?

 

The British Empire Didn’t Collapse in War — It Collapsed Through Its Currency

By Robert Kiyosaki

Most people think the British Empire fell because of war.  That’s wrong.
Britain won World War II.

But it lost something far more important afterward: Its money.  And once a country loses its currency, it eventually loses everything else.

Let me explain.

1945: Britain “Won” the War… But Was Bankrupt

When World War II ended, Britain was still standing militarily — but financially, it was broken.

- Massive war debt

- Destroyed infrastructure

- Rationing that lasted into the 1950s

- A shrinking industrial base

To keep the country running, the British government did what governments always do when they’re broke:

They borrowed.

They printed.

They spent.

And they told the public everything was under control.

Sounds familiar?

THE SLOW DEATH OF THE POUND

Unlike hyperinflation stories like Germany or Zimbabwe, Britain’s collapse was quiet.

No wheelbarrows of cash.

No overnight wipeout.

Instead, the pound died slowly.

1949

Britain officially devalued the pound by 30% against the U.S. dollar.  The public was told it was a “necessary adjustment.”

1967

Another major devaluation — again about 14%.

Each time, British citizens lost purchasing power.  Each time, their savings bought less.  Each time, the government promised stability would return.  It never did.

THIS IS HOW EMPIRES REALLY DECLINE

Britain didn’t collapse in one dramatic moment.

It declined through:

- Chronic deficits

- Currency devaluation

- Loss of global confidence

- Capital fleeing to stronger currencies

- Rising cost of living

- A shrinking middle class

By the late 1960s, the pound was no longer trusted as a global reserve currency.

The empire didn’t fall with bombs.

It faded with inflation.

Here’s the part schools never teach:  Britain’s economy didn’t stop working.  People still had jobs.  Markets still functioned.  But life got harder every year.

- Wages lagged.

- Savings eroded.

- Assets became unaffordable.

The system didn’t “collapse.”  It quietly transferred wealth away from people who trusted the currency…to people who owned real assets.

Americans keep asking:  “Why does the economy feel terrible if the country is still strong?”

That’s exactly what British citizens asked in the 1950s and 60s.

The answer was simple then — and it’s simple now:

The country isn’t collapsing.

The currency is being devalued.

And when that happens:

- Savers lose

- Wage earners fall behind

- Asset owners move ahead

Britain learned this the hard way.  Empires don’t usually die loudly.  They die slowly… while people are told everything is fine.

Britain went from global superpower to secondary player not because it lost wars — but because it lost monetary discipline.

History doesn’t repeat.  But it rhymes perfectly.

And if you understand how the British pound fell…  you’ll understand exactly why life feels more expensive today — even when the headlines say everything is “strong.”

That’s the cost of a dying currency.

And it’s always paid by the people who trust it the most.

Source / Comment

It's Time for The Caribbean’s Sovereign Rail

For fifty years, the global financial system ran on a single dominant rail.  That era is over

THE WORLD AS IT IS — PART XVIII

Tuesday, 3 March 2026

7:35 AM Eastern Standard Time

By CRAIG F. BUTLER, ESQ.

There are moments when commentary is no longer sufficient.

Part XVIII is not commentary.   It is construction.

For weeks we have examined fractures — war, sanctions, mineral leverage, security realignment, the Great Repricing.

Now we move to rails.

The question is no longer who strikes, who sanctions, or who aligns.  The question is: who settles?

Because in a multipolar world, settlement systems are power.

For fifty years, the global financial system ran on a single dominant rail.  That era is over.

Sanctions have been weaponized.

SWIFT has been politicized.

CIPS has matured.

BRICS Pay is forming.

CBDCs are operational.

The world is fragmenting into monetary corridors.  And in that fragmentation lies opportunity.

Part XVIII makes a disciplined argument:

The Caribbean is no longer a peripheral financial basin.  It is positioned to become a sovereign settlement corridor.

The region now sits on a tri-layer architecture:

• Middle-power stability (British regulatory credibility, Canadian banking continuity)

• Sovereign currencies (Bahamian, Jamaican, Eastern Caribbean, Trinidadian, Barbadian)

• Operational digital rails (Sand Dollar, Jam-Dex, DCash)

No other small-state region in the world has this configuration.

What is missing is not currency.  It is clearing.  It is interoperability.

It is a sovereign settlement system that reduces dependence on external rails and anchors the Caribbean in the Age of Consequences.

Part XVIII identifies the gap — and the build.

It argues that:

• Settlement defines sovereignty.

• Clearing defines leverage.

• Digital rails define independence.

• Small states with stability become strategic.

The Bahamas is uniquely positioned to anchor this rail.  Not as rhetoric.  As architecture.

This chapter is not about nostalgia.  It is about infrastructure.

The Caribbean’s sovereign rail is no longer theoretical.

It is the next structural move in a world no longer ruled from one capital.

Part XVIII begins now.

PART XVIII — THE CARIBBEAN’S SOVEREIGN RAIL

Digital money, regional clearing, and the emergence of an independent settlement system

I. The World Is Moving Away From Single‑Rail Finance

For fifty years, the global financial system ran on one dominant rail: SWIFT.  That world is gone.

The U.S.–Israel–Iran rupture, the weaponization of sanctions, the rise of BRICS, and the emergence of digital currencies have fractured the monetary landscape.  Today, the world runs on multiple rails:

• SWIFT (U.S.–EU)

• CIPS (China)

• BRICS Pay (emerging)

• CBDCs (state digital currencies)

• private rails (Visa, Mastercard, fintech networks)

In this environment, small states cannot rely on a single system.  They need sovereign rails — systems they control, not systems they borrow.

The Caribbean is now positioned to build one.

II. The Caribbean’s Monetary Architecture Has Three Layers

Part XVII established the middle‑power scaffolding: Britain and Canada.

Part XVIII builds the sovereign layer above it.

The Caribbean’s monetary architecture now has three distinct layers:

1. Middle‑Power Stability (External)

• British regulatory credibility

• Canadian banking infrastructure

2. Sovereign Currencies (Internal)

• Bahamian dollar

• Jamaican dollar

• Eastern Caribbean dollar

• Trinidad & Tobago dollar

• Barbadian dollar

3. Digital Sovereign Rails (Emerging)

• Sand Dollar (Bahamas)

• Jam‑Dex (Jamaica)

• DCash (ECCB)

This is the foundation for a Caribbean settlement system — a rail that is:

• sovereign

• digital

• regional

• interoperable

• independent of great‑power politics

No other small‑state region has this combination.

III. The Sand Dollar as the Prototype Rail

The Bahamas did not simply launch a digital currency.  It launched the first operational CBDC in the world — and in doing so, it created the prototype for a Caribbean monetary rail.

The Sand Dollar provides:

• instant settlement

• offline capability for outer islands

• regulatory clarity

• financial inclusion

• resilience during shocks

• a sovereign payment channel

In a world where:

• correspondent banking is shrinking

• sanctions are expanding

• SWIFT is politicized

• global rails are fragmenting

…the Sand Dollar becomes a sovereign shield.

It is the first Caribbean rail that is not dependent on external powers.

IV. The Region Is Quietly Becoming a Digital Currency Cluster

Three CBDCs in one region is not coincidence.  It is architecture.

The Bahamas — Sand Dollar

The world’s first fully deployed CBDC.

Jamaica — Jam‑Dex

A retail CBDC designed for inclusion and micro‑commerce.

ECCB — DCash

A multi‑state digital currency across eight countries.

This cluster gives the Caribbean:

• a shared technological base

• a shared regulatory framework

• a shared digital identity

• the ability to build interoperability

Interoperability is the key.  It is how a region becomes a monetary bloc.

V. The Missing Piece: A Regional Clearinghouse

The Caribbean has:

• currencies

• digital currencies

• banks

• offshore centers

• middle‑power scaffolding

What it does not yet have is:

• a regional clearinghouse

• a sovereign settlement system

• a cross‑border CBDC corridor

• a non‑SWIFT payment rail

This is the gap.  This is the opportunity.  This is the sovereign project.

A Caribbean clearinghouse would:

• settle trade within the region

• settle Africa–Caribbean flows

• reduce reliance on U.S. correspondent banks

• insulate the region from sanctions spillover

• create a Caribbean “alternate rate”

• anchor the region in the Great Repricing

This is the rail that must be built.

VI. The Bahamas as the Anchor of the Sovereign Rail

The Bahamas is uniquely positioned to anchor the Caribbean rail because it has:

• a sovereign currency

• a sovereign digital currency

• a mature offshore financial sector

• regulatory credibility

• geographic centrality

• AU–CARICOM alignment

• British and Canadian stabilizers

• a reputation for compliance

• a history of financial innovation

This combination does not exist anywhere else in the region.

The Bahamas is the only jurisdiction that can:

• host the clearinghouse

• host the settlement system

• host the Africa–Caribbean commodities exchange

• host the digital corridor

• anchor the regional rail

This is the sovereign role.

VII. The Strategic Meaning in the Age of Consequences

In a fractured world:

• chokepoints matter

• settlement systems define leverage

• digital rails define sovereignty

• middle powers define stability

• small states with stability become valuable

The Caribbean’s tri‑rail system — British stability, Canadian banking, Caribbean sovereignty — becomes a zone of resilience.

And The Bahamas becomes the sovereign anchor of that zone.

This is not a regional story.

This is an Atlantic story.

This is a multipolar story.

This is a sovereignty story.

VIII. What Must Now Be Built

The architecture is ready.  The moment is here.

The Caribbean must now build:

• a regional clearinghouse

• CBDC interoperability

• a sovereign settlement rail

• a non‑SWIFT corridor

• an Africa–Caribbean payment bridge

• a commodities exchange in The Bahamas

• a Caribbean alternate rate

This is the Caribbean’s sovereign rail.  This is Part XVIII.

Source / Comment

Our World as It Is

THE WORLD AS IT IS

PART XVI — THE AGE OF CONSEQUENCES

Sunday, 1 March 2026 — 7:40 AM EST

By CRAIG F. BUTLER, ESQ.

There are moments when analysis must harden into record.

Part XVI is not reaction.  It is structural recognition.

The United States–Israel strike on Iran is not merely a regional escalation.  It is an accelerant — one that forces the global system to reveal what it has already become.

For years, we have examined posture:

• carrier groups repositioned

• sanctions expanding

• alliances recalibrating

• minerals repricing

• sovereignty asserting itself

Now we move beyond signal.

This chapter addresses consequence.

What happened was not simply military.

It was valuation.

The old order assumed American force stabilized markets.  The emerging order prices American force as risk.

That shift is historic.

Part XVI maps the immediate consequences:

• the collapse of automatic alignment in the Gulf

• the insurance markets repricing corridor risk in real time

• the fracture lines inside Western security architecture

• the acceleration of Global South leverage

• the strategic reweighting of Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean

This is not ideological commentary.  It is macro-structural observation.

The rupture did not create multipolarity.

It exposed it.  And exposure changes behaviour.

The Great Repricing is no longer theoretical.

It is active.

Energy routes, maritime insurance, alliance cohesion, diplomatic credibility, sovereign leverage — all are being recalculated.

Power is no longer inherited.  It is negotiated.

Dominance is no longer assumed.  It is tested.

This is the age of consequences.  And this is the world as it is.

THE WORLD AS IT IS 

PART XVI — THE AGE OF CONSEQUENCES : CRAIG F BUTLER ESQ.

How the U.S.–Israel–Iran rupture accelerates the Great Repricing

I. The World After the Strike

The night the United States and Israel struck Iran did more than ignite a regional war.  It exposed a truth that had been building for a decade: the global system no longer absorbs American force the way it once did.  The perimeter cracked.  The center shook.  And the world — from the Gulf to Africa to the Caribbean — recalibrated in real time.

This is not a military event.  This is a valuation event.

The old order priced American action as stabilizing.  The new world prices it as risk.

That shift is the beginning of the Great Repricing.

II. The Collapse of Automatic Compliance

For fifty years, the Middle East operated under a simple geometry:

• The U.S. enforced the perimeter.

• Israel enforced deterrence.

• Gulf monarchies aligned with both.

• Iran was contained.

That geometry collapsed in a single night.

What changed:

• Saudi Arabia and the UAE refused U.S. use of their bases.

• The UK blocked access to Diego Garcia.

• Oman publicly rebuked Washington.

• Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait were struck by Iranian missiles.

• Israel acted unilaterally, and the U.S. followed.

This is not a diplomatic disagreement.  This is the end of automatic alignment.

The world is no longer organized around American permission.  It is organized around national survival.

III. The Financial Shockwave

The first markets to react were not oil or equities.  They were insurance markets — the quiet barometers of global fear.

War‑risk premiums in the Gulf jumped from 0.2–0.3% to 0.5%, and for Israeli ports to 1%. Quotes shortened from 48 hours to 24.  Tanker rates doubled.  Underwriters began pricing the Middle East as a live theatre, not a stable corridor.

This is the real signal:

The world is repricing risk faster than the old order can manage it.

And when risk is repriced, power is repriced.

IV. The Global South Steps Into the Vacuum

The rupture did not weaken the Global South.  It strengthened it.

Why:

• The U.S. is now tied down in a direct war with Iran.

• Europe is exposed to energy volatility.

• The Gulf is hedging.

• Asia is recalculating supply chains.

• BRICS is watching the U.S. expend strategic capital.

Meanwhile:

• Africa controls the minerals of the 21st century.

• Latin America controls the new oil frontier.

• The Caribbean controls shipping lanes and offshore reserves.

• The Indian Ocean and West Africa control maritime chokepoints.

The old world is distracted.  The new world is consolidating.

This is the Great Repricing in motion.

V. The Return of Sovereign Calculation

The strike on Iran did not just destabilize a region.  It destabilized the assumption that power flows in one direction.

The new reality:

• Power must negotiate its limits.

• Force has consequences.

• Alignment is conditional.

• Sovereignty is transactional.

• The Global South is no longer a spectator.

This is why Africa’s continental institutions matter.  This is why CARICOM’s alignment with the AU matters.  This is why Guyana’s oil matters.  This is why The Bahamas’ strategic geography matters.

The world is no longer divided into “powers” and “periphery.”  It is divided into those who can absorb shocks and those who cannot.

The Global South is learning to absorb shocks.  The old order is struggling to contain them.

VI. The Middle East as a Mirror

The U.S.–Israel–Iran rupture is not an isolated conflict.  It is a mirror reflecting the fragility of the old system.

What the mirror shows:

• Diplomacy without trust collapses.

• Deterrence without legitimacy fails.

• Power without restraint destabilizes.

• Alliances without reciprocity fracture.

• Systems built on dominance cannot survive multipolar pressure.

The Middle East is not the exception.  It is the preview.

VII. The Great Repricing Accelerates

The Great Repricing is not a theory.  It is a sequence.

Step 1: The old order cracks.

The U.S. and Israel strike Iran.  Iran strikes U.S. bases.  Gulf states refuse alignment.  Europe panics.  Markets spike.

Step 2: The world recalibrates.

Insurance premiums rise.  Shipping routes shift.  Energy markets tighten.  Alliances wobble.

Step 3: The Global South gains leverage.

Africa’s minerals become indispensable.  Latin America’s oil becomes strategic.  The Caribbean’s geography becomes critical.  Asia’s supply chains diversify.

Step 4: Power becomes distributed.

No single actor can enforce order.  Balance replaces dominance.  Negotiation replaces assumption.  Sovereignty replaces dependency.

This is the Great Repricing.  Not as aspiration — but as reality.

VIII. The World That Emerges

The world emerging from this rupture is not the world of 1991, 2003, or even 2020.

It is a world where:

• The U.S. is powerful but constrained.

• Israel is capable but isolated.

• Iran is wounded but defiant.

• The Gulf is cautious but sovereign.

• Europe is anxious but dependent.

• China is quiet but calculating.

• Russia is opportunistic but limited.

• Africa is rising but underestimated.

• The Caribbean is small but strategically placed.

This is not the end of the old order.  This is the beginning of the post‑order.

A world where power is not inherited — it is negotiated.  A world where dominance is not assumed — it is tested.  A world where sovereignty is not symbolic — it is strategic.

This is the world as it is.  And the world as it is becoming.

Source / Comment

The Brothers and Sisters in The Bahamas - Love and Support Marvin Dames 100%

To Know Marvin Dames - is to Love Marvin Dames

By Laurie Dames

For most of his adult life, my brother Marvin has served this country - The Bahamasnwith integrity and courage.  From his years in the Royal Bahamas Police Force to his time as Minister of National Security, his record speaks for itself.

Recently, a young man who was in business with him made a reckless and illegal decision.  He was caught, and he has taken full responsibility for his actions.

Let’s be clear about something.  When you operate multiple businesses and employ over 100 people, you cannot be everywhere at once.  You cannot monitor every move of every partner or employee 24 hours a day.  That is simply not how business, or life, works.

Marvin did not commit this act.  He was not involved in this act.  And it is unfair and dishonest to suggest otherwise, especially for political gain.

Those who truly know him know his character.  They know his commitment to law, order, and the safety of this nation.  That has not changed.

I know Marvin will continue to live and serve with the same integrity and strength he always has.

#ISTAND with MARVIN DAMES - Mount Moriah Constituency

Source / Comment

What is Cubanism?

 

Cubanism is about solidarity

“DEO ADJUVANTE, NON TIMENDUM 

“WITH GOD AS MY HELPER, I HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR”

                                            "CUBA WILL RISE"        

By Dr Kevin Alcena

Because of the seemingly growing concept of rich /poor country relationship, concerns toward development countries and their policies have experienced a tremendous leap in international arenas in a relatively short period of time.

Much of this conversation was influenced by the teachings of the counter - revolution of the late - 1950s.  Clearly, it was a revolution emphasizing the importance of promoting markets whilst cautioning the hazard of government policies in negatively affecting the benefit; to promote human development policies rather than concentrating on the physical capital, and the unappealing effect of some government polices toward economic.

In the past, the underlying cause of inadequate development were thought to be found in the lack of the criminal embargo that was imposed by the USA against Cuba.  Now they do not want them to have oil.  Shame!  It took the arrival of the counter-revolution to divert the concentration elsewhere to a specific cause, which I feel will ultimately constitute a new trend for the like of 'Cubanism.

Today is a power trip; no empathy about how a person live off $20 pesos - this is crazy, especially a family with 5 little children.  Where is the outcry?  It is not even the superego judging the ego.  It's our own capacity for lack of empathy, increasing until it becomes a kind of compulsion -neurosis where reverence and destruction alternate, and we reverently destroy our Cuba land.  We deny The Cuban people their rights like little children.

Cubanism is about solidarity.  Mandate of the people’s matter.  This is Cubanism.  Cuba is crying, I can't breathe, I lost my job, I have no food, I can't pay my rent, and my family abroad cannot help me because of the US embargo and restrictions.

Many Mothers cannot find food, and now many brothers are begging for food.  Cuba cries, I can't breathe.  We need global solidarity.  Oh Lord.  There is no dignity in this battleground of shame by so called elite-class in United States that is attempting to choke Cuba - as simple new styles of compulsion corruption by the imperialistic agenda that has no shame.

Cubanism solidarity is a science that has crushed the neo-fascism and has put Machiavellianism deceptive and clandestine plan that is instigated by US.

The inexhaustible spirit of the Cubanism has overcome negative karma.

The Cuban so -called neo-traditional pro-quo fascist elements in the Cuba are back, and Morologists USA is benefits it is no business - where is outcry?  Trying to rewrite the Cuban history.  Shame!

Our western culture, self-toxified by the poisonous egocentric ideology of imperialism and neo-fascism and the neo-traditional anachronism, is the unhappy heir of the terminator attitude that has precipitated an era of relentless upheaval and intense political propaganda in the decade-long economic growth from the Cubanism outstanding achievement for Cubans.

Salvery, based upon greed control and racism.  We are witnessing in the Cuban type of economic slavery - ugly and diabolical form as in Cuba’s beautiful society.  They want to stop oil from coming to Cuba, is a criminal act of humanity.

Solidarity is the key in this battleground of the most recent pandemic crisis; respect the law say home we will all overcome.  I salute my beautiful Cuban people.  Cuba will rise out of this crisis.

Cubanism at its code is solidarity for all citizens.  2026 and beyond will be a great year for this beautiful Cuban republic.

18 February 2026

Source / Comment