The Cuban People want Peace
Havana, May 21, 2026.
“DEO ADJUVANTE, NON TIMENDUM
“WITH GOD AS MY HELPER, I HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR”
By Dr Kevin Alcena
Because of the seemingly growing concept of rich /poor country relationship, concerns toward development countries and their policies have experienced a tremendous leap in international arenas in a relatively short period of time.
Much of this conversation was influenced by the teachings of the counter - revolution of the late - 1950s. Clearly, it was a revolution emphasizing the importance of promoting markets whilst cautioning the hazard of government policies in negatively affecting the benefit; to promote human development policies rather than concentrating on the physical capital, and the unappealing effect of some government polices toward economic.
In the past, the underlying cause of inadequate development were thought to be found in the lack of the criminal embargo that was imposed by the USA against Cuba. Now they do not want them to have oil. Shame! It took the arrival of the counter-revolution to divert the concentration elsewhere to a specific cause, which I feel will ultimately constitute a new trend for the like of 'Cubanism.
Today is a power trip; no empathy about how a person live off $20 pesos - this is crazy, especially a family with 5 little children. Where is the outcry? It is not even the superego judging the ego. It's our own capacity for lack of empathy, increasing until it becomes a kind of compulsion -neurosis where reverence and destruction alternate, and we reverently destroy our Cuba land. We deny The Cuban people their rights like little children.
Cubanism solidarity is a science that has crushed the neo-fascism and has put Machiavellianism deceptive and clandestine plan that is instigated by US.
The inexhaustible spirit of the Cubanism has overcome negative karma.
The Cuban so -called neo-traditional pro-quo fascist elements in the Cuba are back, and Morologists USA is benefits it is no business - where is outcry? Trying to rewrite the Cuban history. Shame!
Our western culture, self-toxified by the poisonous egocentric ideology of imperialism and neo-fascism and the neo-traditional anachronism, is the unhappy heir of the terminator attitude that has precipitated an era of relentless upheaval and intense political propaganda in the decade-long economic growth from the Cubanism outstanding achievement for Cubans.
Salvery, based upon greed control and racism. We are witnessing in the Cuban type of economic slavery - ugly and diabolical form as in Cuba’s beautiful society. They want to stop oil from coming to Cuba, is a criminal act of humanity.
Solidarity is the key in this battleground of the most recent pandemic crisis; respect the law say home we will all overcome. I salute my beautiful Cuban people. Cuba will rise out of this crisis.
Cubanism at its code is solidarity for all citizens. 2026 and beyond will be a great year for this beautiful Cuban republic.
18 February 2026
Today, the Department of State took steps to impose visa restrictions on African, Cuban, and Grenadian government officials, and their family members, for their complicity in the Cuban regime’s medical mission scheme in which medical professionals are ‘rented’ by other countries at high prices and most of the revenue is kept by the Cuban authorities. This scheme enriches the corrupt Cuban regime while depriving the Cuban people of essential medical care.
The United States continues to engage governments, and will take action as needed, to bring an end to such forced labor. We urge governments to pay the doctors directly for their services, not the regime slave masters.
The United States aims to support the Cuban people in their pursuit of freedom and dignity and promote accountability for those who perpetuate their exploitation. We call on all nations that support democracy and human rights to join us in this effort to confront the Cuban regime’s abuses and stand with the Cuban people.
By Raúl Antonio Capote and Delfin Xiqués
U.S. embassies, with a long tradition in coups d'état and political subversion - Paraguay 1954, Guatemala 1954, Dominican Republic 1963, Brazil 1964, Argentina 1976, Bolivia 1971, Uruguay 1973, Chile 1973-, became the base of operations for destabilization in the continent.
The military occupation, the imposition of the Platt Amendment in Cuba and the multiple armed interventions of the United States in the internal affairs of the Island, during the first decades of the 20th century, symbolized the advent of the neocolonial Republic.
Then we had Yankee embassy in which more than ambassadors, proconsuls invested with more authority than a Spanish Captain General, bossed presidents, parliamentarians and military.
That lasted until January 1959, when the Revolution triumphed. There were no direct bilateral diplomatic ties between the two countries between 1961 and 2015, after President Dwight D. Eisenhower broke off relations with the largest of the Antilles.
U.S. Ambassadors to Cuba
Herbert G. Squiers: May 20, 1902 - December 2, 1905
- He was a fervent annexationist. He participated on behalf of his country in the signing of the first treaty on the Isle of Pines; he was such an interferenceist that he forced the U.S. State Department in 1905 to remove him from his post.
William E. Gonzales: June 21, 1913-December 18, 1919
- On August 9 he ratified the approval of the government of General Mario García Menocal, who by then succeeded that of General José Miguel Gómez, making use of the Platt Amendment.
Boaz W. Long: June 30, 1919 - June 17, 1921
- During his mission in Cuba, Enoch H. Crowder is appointed with the rank of “personal envoy” of U.S. President Warren G. Harding. The “envoy” supervised Cuban state activities and acted as the highest authority, even above the President of the Republic.
Enoch H. Crowder: February 10, 1923 - May 28, 1927
- On March 5, 1923, he presented his credentials as the first ambassador of his country in the Caribbean nation, when the Northern Legation on the Island became an Embassy.
Harry F. Guggenheim: October 10, 1929 - April 2, 1933
- He was ambassador during the dictatorship of Gerardo Machado, which he supported on behalf of his government.
Sumner Welles: April 24, 1933 - December 13, 1933
- Sent to Cuba as “mediator” between the dictator Gerardo Machado and the popular forces. His presence was declared unwelcome by the Hundred Days Government, due to his interfering attitude.
Jefferson Caffery: February 23, 1934- March 9, 1937
- He continued the same line of his predecessor and began to conspire with elements opposed to the revolutionary government to overthrow it.
Robert Butler: May 22, 1948- February 10, 1951
- On March 11, 1949, U.S. Marines, who had arrived in Havana's port, outraged the statue of José Martí. The ambassador's apology showed the Government's contempt for him; he did not even know the name of Cuba's National Hero.
Arthur Gardner: May 28, 1953 - June 16, 1957
- He was a staunch supporter of Fulgencio Batista. The CIA station in Havana had at that time more than two dozen operational officers in its embassy. During his work, the Bureau for the Repression of Communist Activities (BRAC) was created on the island.
Earl E. Smith: June 3, 1957 - January 19, 1959
- Openly supported the dictatorship of Fulgencio Batista. After the triumph of the Cuban Revolution, Smith resigned on January 10, 1959 and was replaced by Phillip W. Bonsal.
Heads of the U.S. Interests Section (USINT)
The U.S. Interests Section (USINT) operated from September 1, 1977 to July 20, 2015, and became the headquarters of the counterrevolution in Cuba.
Lyle Franklin Lane: 1977-1979
- He was appointed by President Jimmy Carter as the first Chief of the U.S. Interests Section in Havana.
Curtis W. Kamman: 1985-1987
- On January 29, 1987, Commander-in-Chief Fidel Castro Ruz warned Curtis W. Kamman about the espionage activities carried out from USINT. In the summer of that year more than one hundred CIA officers, among those stationed at SINA, were unmasked.
Joseph Sullivan: 1993-1996
- Maintained close ties with “opposition” groups, among them the “dissidents” of Concilio Cubano.
Vicki Huddleston: 1999-2002
- In 2000, USINT sought to manipulate an event of great international prestige such as the 7th edition of the Havana Biennial. Parallel to the event's activities, officials of the Interests Section developed their own plan: an aggressive operation of influence and recruitment.
James Cason: 2002-2005
- Following instructions from the White House, he used diplomatic immunity to organize meetings in his official residence with leaders of counterrevolutionary organizations. He supported “opposition” organizations with all kinds of resources, which was denounced in 2003 by Cuban television.
Michael E. Parmly: 2005-2008
- He gave continuity to the work of his predecessor. Notes exchanged between Martha Beatriz Roque Cabello and Cuban-Americans living in Florida implicated Parmly with Cuban-born terrorist Santiago Álvarez Fernández-Magriñá.
Jonathan D. Farrar: 2008-2010
- In 2010 the Wikileaks site declassified a cable from Farrar in which he acknowledged that he was in contact “with most of the official dissident movement in Havana,” whose members, he claimed, frequently visit USINT.
John Caulfield: 2011 - 2014
- On June 19, 2012, USINT culminated an Introduction to Journalism course through which about 26 counterrevolutionaries obtained their diplomas, issued by Florida International University.
All of the following served as Chargé d'Affaires a.i. at the U.S. Embassy.
Mara Tekach: July 20, 2018-July 21, 2020
- On November 20, 2019, Tekach was charged with working closely with Cuban counterrevolutionary José Daniel Ferrer. He focused his work on the purpose of recruiting mercenaries, identified areas of the economy against which to target coercive measures, and actively engaged in defamation and open incitement to violence.
Timothy Zúñiga-Brown: July 31, 2020 to July 14, 2022
- He worked to create an artificial crisis, trying to portray as political an economic emigration caused, in the first place, by the very blockade measures designed for that purpose. He was determined, like his predecessors, to provoke an explosion on the island by any means necessary.
Mike Hammer November 14, 2024
- The “Ambassador of the Cuban counterrevolution” carries out an active provocative work with the aim of creating a diplomatic crisis that will lead to his expulsion from Cuba and justify the closing of the embassy. To that end he consciously violates everything established.
First, no need for all this panicking. Countries don’t die. Second, Canada must assess whether and to what degree export/sales will slow as result of the tariffs; at 25% premium they could still see significant sales.
Third, a slight devaluation in the Canadian dollar is a short-term option; which would offset the tariff.
Fourth, Canada needs a bold response that rocks the U.S. back in its heels. That would be to end the Cuban Embargo by completing a trade Agreement with Cuba to raise up Cuban agriculture, using Canadian know-how, technology and equipment. Stand up Cuban hotels and open to Chinese tourists. There would be latency, but the political statement would be bold. One must attack always, but in these circumstances, moreso and the lesson is they oughtn’t have been resting in the comfort of their U.S. relationships, Trump or no Trump!
Fifth, Canada could join BRICs together with Mexico; purely political…but bold!
The truth is, Canada-(trade:77%)/Mexico-(trade: 84%) were lazy and locked their economies too intimately with the US’s and the sting of lower export volumes will hurt.
Mr. Trump dosen’t have an ask here…not better trade terms or anything, so it seems he just wants to punish Canada and Mexico to the delight of his supporters.
The strategy would be that by mid-term, Trump would be less potent as his chaos would catch up to him. During his previous administration, tariffs cost him $35 billion in subsidies. In one of his cascades of executive orders, he rescinded reporting requirements for the department of trade. So he’ll just claim they are ‘making billions’; which even toddlers know is rubbish. Also, trade was reduced to Russia and China last administration but accrued not to domestic U.S. suppliers but to Mexico and Canada!
Outlier:
Canada could set up shop in The Bahamas and trade to its U.S. buyers from Bahamas…
This Bahamas option is an outlier.
It would be a matter of “derring do”!
I believe our economic model puts us in a worse “sitting duck” position than is Canada or Mexico.
We must attempt to imagine near impossible options on economy as we must on environment.
Structurally, The Bahamas is perfect as a “stealth” substitute trade hub for Canadian goods to entire U.S.
There, the question is timing, structure, linkages to U.S. strategic business, banking, conceptual framing.
We’d have to have an attitude that it’s a fluid proposition and since Canada nor Mexico structure their trade for leverage…we’d have to use leverage - relationships with persons and companies that are hard to punish - to knit together a trade proposition.
As I’ve said, all successful nations have done a “hard thing”; something that carries high risk, goes against the cultural grain and is asymmetrical.
This could be our hard thing!
But as I said, it’s an outlier proposition…if successful it may succeed only for a while!
By Maby Martinez Rodriguez
Cuba celebrates Thursday a new victory in its struggle against the U.S. blockade, by achieving overwhelming support in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) for a resolution approved by 185 votes in favor, two against and two abstentions.
The report presented for the thirtieth time states that only between August 2021 and February 2022 that unilateral policy caused Cuba losses in the order of 3,806.5 million dollars. The figure is 49% higher than that reported between January and July 2021 and a record in just seven months.
At current prices, the accumulated damages during six decades of the blockade amount to 150,410.8 million dollars, with a great weight on sectors such as health and education, in addition to the damage to the national economy and the quality of life of Cuban families.
In the first 14 months of the Biden Administration alone, the losses caused by the blockade amounted to 6,364 million dollars, which is equivalent to an impact of more than 454 million dollars a month and more than 15 million dollars a day, according to the document.
The extraterritorial impact of the blockade harms the sovereignty of the countries of the United Nations, sanctions their businessmen and impedes access to their ports for third party ships that dock in Cuba. It also prevents the importation into Cuba of articles produced in any country when they have 10% or more of U.S. components, the foreign minister denounced.
“Haitians fleeing their country amidst a humanitarian and human rights crisis should be welcomed and have the right to seek safety in the USA without discrimination. They must not be held in a third country or a US navy base infamous for unlawful and indefinite arbitrary detention and torture.”
“Amnesty International has demonstrated that successive US governments have tried to deter Haitian people from claiming asylum in the United States through the application of policies designed to intercept, detain, and remove them, starting in the 1970s and continuing with Title 42. Their tactics have included unlawful pushbacks at sea, mass detention, torture or other ill-treatment, and expedited removal proceedings with deficiencies in individualized screenings. In the 1990s, for instance, US authorities shamefully detained Haitian asylum seekers living with HIV in camps in Guantánamo Bay. Similarly, between September 2021 and May 2022 alone, the USA expelled more than 25,000 Haitians, many under Title 42. The Biden administration has only reinforced harmful historical tendencies which have stereotyped Haitians as bearers of disease, standing to further stigmatize and discriminate Haitians based on their race and nationality.”
“It is time for the United States to put a stop once and for all to this discriminatory treatment and make sure that Haitian asylum seekers have access to US territory and due process without discrimination to exercise their rights to seek asylum, including individualized assessments of their international protection claims. The ongoing operations at the Guantánamo Bay naval base are already marred with horrendous human rights violations, and Amnesty International has long called for the detention facility to be shuttered for good. The United States must refrain from using this site to commit more abuses.”
I am obliged to denounce the fact that the U.S. government has decided to exclude the Republic of Cuba from preparations for the Ninth Summit of the Americas set to take place in Los Angeles, June 8-10; and is currently exerting extreme pressure on numerous governments in the region that have privately and respectfully opposed this exclusion.
The U.S. government is misleading the public and governments of the hemisphere by saying that it has not yet made decisions regarding invitations.
I respectfully urge Secretary of State (Anthony) Blinken to say honestly whether or not Cuba will be invited to the Ninth Summit of the Americas.
A central axis, according to preparations for the event, will be health. And I must inform our people and international public opinion that there are currently negotiations underway, conducted in an unclear manner, with quite a few neoliberal elements, and many shortcomings, in relation to the real needs of the peoples regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, the structural causes of precarious health systems that have led to tragic consequences and caused an extremely high number of deaths in our hemisphere, including the United States of America, and have avoided substantial cooperation and basic financing to address these consequences, and are now negotiating in an opaque manner a so-called Health and Resilience Action Plan for the Americas through the year 2030.
I must note that these negotiations are being held, in an obscure manner, with the exclusion of Cuba and other member states of the Pan American Health Organization, which are participating in these processes, in violation of their own mandates.
Cuba has always, in a modest but altruistic and persistent fashion, provided the possibility for international cooperation in health, which has been recognized worldwide.
There are Latin American vaccines against COVID-19 which are Cuban. The medical brigades that responded to the COVID emergency in the region, in the hemisphere in more than 50 countries on the planet, have been Cuban.
It would be convenient to take into account during this process, and benefit our peoples, Cuban medical presence in confronting natural disasters and epidemics in the past, the provision of tens of thousands of medical scholarships for low-income Latin American, Caribbean and United States youth, the existence of the Latin American School of Medicine in Havana, Operation Miracle that returned the sight of millions of low-income persons, Cuba's ability to establish cooperation, transfer state-of-the-art technology, provide pharmaceutical products, vaccines and novel treatments, the ability to share advanced protocols and medicines in the field of health…
Another central axis of the Summit, from which Cuba is intended to be excluded, is emigration. A document with a long title: Letter of Understanding on Migration Management and Protection of Migrants is also being negotiated behind the back of international, US, Latin American and Canadian public opinion. It is a code that seeks to force Latin American and Caribbean States to repress migration, to absorb the migrants that the United States decides to process outside its territory, which incorporates elements of the racist, xenophobic and plundering U.S. vision of our migrants. It does not address in any way the real causes of migration, but it does, however, offer palliatives, stimuli, financing and economic incentives to countries that send migrants to the U.S. and are closer to its borders, to attenuate this process.
With Cuba, however, his recipe is the extreme tightening of the blockade, causing deprivation to Cuban families, the application of Undersecretary Mallory's stark memorandum: "depressing wages, causing hunger, despair and the overthrow of the Government," is the American prescription in relation to Cuba…
The exclusion of Cuba from the Ninth Summit of the Americas would constitute a serious historical setback in relation to the two previous editions. In Panama, in 2015, Army General Raúl Castro Ruz led the delegation from our island which participated on equal footing, and raised his firm, dissenting voice, but always serene, respectful and constructive…
A third axis of the Summit of the Americas is that of democracy and human rights. In the obscure negotiations taking place today, the intention is to establish the Organization of American States to certify all elections in the region. This is the same OAS of the coup in Bolivia, and the intention of the United States, historically responsible for coups in our region, and also responsible for the coups in recent decades against progressive governments.
How can a Summit take place, centered on democracy, having excluded, at the arbitrary whim of the host, certain countries of Latin America and the Caribbean? Can anyone think of something more undemocratic?
The U.S. has no moral authority to set itself up as a model in this matter or to criticize others…
The Ninth Summit of the Americas could still be an opportunity if, in an inclusive manner and on equal terms for all countries, it debated, without exclusions and with sincere commitment, the most pressing problems that affect the continent.
Cuba supports the genuine efforts to promote dialogue, links and cooperation between Our America, the America of Bolivar and Martí, and the United States, between the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States and the United States government…
Cuba, which firmly defends the unity within the diversity of Our America, today expresses our profound gratitude to the peoples and governments that maintain a courageous, dignified, solidary position, demanding of the U.S. government that Cuba not be excluded from the Ninth Summit of the Americas.