Google Ads

Showing posts with label Bahamas Supreme Court. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bahamas Supreme Court. Show all posts

Friday, December 16, 2022

Securities Commission of The Commonwealth of The Bahamas Addresses Misstatements made by Mr. John J. Ray III, The Representative of the U.S. FTX debtors

Securities Commission of The Bahamas Addresses Misstatements in FTX's US Bankruptcy Case


Securities Commission of The Bahamas
Nassau, The Bahamas, Tuesday 13 December 2022 – Regrettably, the Securities Commission of The Bahamas must once again correct key misstatements made by Mr. John J. Ray III, the representative of the U.S. FTX debtors, which do not appear to be concerned with facts but rather, appear intended only to make headlines and advance questionable agendas.

To be clear, the Securities Commission of The Bahamas was the first regulator in the world to take strong, decisive action to protect the customers and creditors of FTX – regardless of where they may be located.  Every action taken by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas was in strict accordance with our country’s legislation and with orders made by the Supreme Court of The Bahamas.  These actions included securing the transfer of potentially commingled digital assets of FTX Digital Markets Ltd. and affiliates to a secure location under the authority of an Order issued by the Supreme Court of The Bahamas.  The Commission holds those assets as trustee only (under Bahamian Law), and they will be ultimately distributed, to creditors and clients of FTX, wherever they may be located, in accordance with the court’s direction.

Mr. Ray has referred to redacted email correspondence by and between Mr. Bankman-Fried and Bahamian officials.  Those redactions were designed to create a false impression of communications between Mr. Bankman-Fried and the Commission.  These redactions are disturbing as Mr. Ray is aware that the full email reveals Mr. Bankman-Fried’s acknowledgement that he had “not briefed the Securities Commission.”  The Commission has previously addressed improper distributions to Bahamian citizens in its statement dated 12 November 2022.  The Commission reaffirms its prior statement and notes that to the extent improper distributions were made to Bahamian citizens, such distributions will be subject to the appropriate claw back actions under the law.

The Commission also finds it disturbing that, either deliberately or through ignorance, Mr. Ray’s filings and communications continue to wrongfully confuse as one, the actions of the Government of The Bahamas, the Securities Commission of The Bahamas and the Court Appointed/Court Supervised Joint Provisional Liquidators. 

The Securities Commission continues to conduct a comprehensive and diligent investigation into the causes of FTX’s failure, working in cooperation with law enforcement and regulatory authorities both in The Bahamas and other jurisdictions.  The Securities Commission will make all appropriate findings and recommendations, in the appropriate forum, at the conclusion of its investigation.  Persons who are found to have engaged in misconduct will be held accountable in accordance with Bahamian law.  Unfortunately,  it has been necessary for the Securities Commission to make a request to Mr. Ray’s representatives to not obstruct that investigation.

Mr. Ray has not once reached out to the Securities Commission to discuss any of his concerns before airing them publicly.  He, however, has been informed, by letter dated 7 December 2022 to his counsel, that –  “… to the extent the Commission is able to assist in the efficient and mutually respectful conduct of the several pending proceedings without impairing the conduct or confidentiality of its ongoing regulatory investigation, including by participating in a meeting with your clients [i.e. FTX US Debtors represented by Mr. John J. Ray III], the Joint Provisional Liquidators and/or their respective counsel, they [i.e. the Commission] are prepared to do so.  An appropriate and necessary part of any arrangement reached during such meeting, would be your clients’ assurance that they will take no further action to interfere with the Commission’s investigation and other regulatory measures.”

(Emphasis Added). 

Mr. Ray has not responded to the Commission to date. 


Editor’s Information:


1. The Securities Commission of The Bahamas (the Commission) is a statutory body established in 1995 pursuant to the Securities Board Act, 1995.  That Act has since been repealed and replaced by new legislation.

2. The Commission’s mandate is defined in the Securities Industry Act, 2011 (SIA, 2011).

3. The Commission is responsible for the administration of the SIA, 2011 and the Investment Funds Act, 2019 (IFA), which provides for the supervision and regulation of the activities of the investment funds, securities and capital markets.

4. The Commission is responsible for the administration of the Financial and Corporate Service Providers Act, 2020.

5. The Commission is responsible for the administration of the Digital Assets and Registered Exchanges Act, 2020.

6. The Commission is responsible for the administration of the Carbon Credit Trading Act, 2022.

7. The functions of the Commission are to: advise the Minister on all matters relating to the capital markets and its participants;

  •  maintain surveillance over the capital markets and ensure orderly, fair and equitable dealings in securities;
  •  foster timely, accurate, fair and efficient disclosure of information to the investing public and the capital markets;
  •  protect the integrity of the capital markets against any abuses arising from financial crime, market misconduct and other unfair and improper practices;
  •  promote an understanding by the public of the capital markets and its participants and the benefits, risks, and liabilities associated with investing;
  •  create and promote conditions that facilitate the orderly development of the capital markets; and
  •  perform any other function conferred or imposed on it by securities laws or Parliament (SIA, 2011, s.12).

Thursday, January 7, 2010

Bahamas: Attorney voices concern over retired politicians on bench

By TANEKA THOMPSON
Tribune Staff Reporter
tthompson@tribunemedia.net:



ATTORNEY Damian Gomez contends that the number of retired politicians who are taking up positions on the bench makes it harder for lawyers to find a sitting judge without an apparent conflict of interest in civil suits against the AG's office.

Mr Gomez claims this has created a court backlog contributing to deteriorating public confidence in the legal system.

His comments add to the growing concern that the anticipated appointment of former MP Malcolm Adderley to the Supreme Court bench will undermine the independence of the judiciary from the influence of the executive branch of Government.

"It's just an impossible situation and now we have another person (who may be appointed to the bench) which may add to the difficulty in getting a judge who may or may not have a conflict.

"What it does is lend credence to the critics of our court system, who say all it is, is politics. I'm not prepared to say it's political interference, I don't know, it doesn't have the right smell. It undermines the public confidence of the (court), " he said when contacted yesterday for comment.

Mr Adderley is 64 years old, just shy of the mandatory retirement age of 65 for a judge. It has been rumoured in political circles that Mr Adderley will be offered an extension past the normal retirement age from Government.

Mr Gomez thinks Mr Adderley is qualified for the job but said this reported arrangement would suggest that the ex-MP "will not be as conflict-free in public law matters as he ought".

"I happen to like Malcolm Adderley as a person but I'm just saying that I just find it strange that on the eve of the age of ordinary retirement, he would be given a post which would, in order to make sense, would require him to be extended beyond two years," he continued.

There is also a cry for constitutional reform in order to limit the control a prime minister has over the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government.

Pushing for such reform is fringe political group, the National Development Party, which questioned if Mr Adderley used his political leverage as a bargaining chip to secure a judicial post. The NDP argued that his resignation from the House was proof that the constitution is "vulnerable to abuse."

"It is because our constitution was not designed to protect the citizenry from the abuse of power by the Prime Minister, that Mr Malcolm Adderley is today causing the public to question whether he used his elected office as a bargaining chip in this game of political poker that has been played between the FNM and the PLP since May of 2007," the NDP told the press in an impromptu press conference on the steps of the House of Assembly yesterday morning, after Mr Adderley resigned from Parliament.

This comes after speculation that Government wooed Mr Adderley away from the PLP with promises of a post within the Supreme Court in exchange for his seat.

The NDP said the country must institute constitutional safeguards to limit a prime minister's "absolute power", if the Bahamas plans to escape being categorised as a "Banana Republic."

tribune242