Google Ads

Showing posts with label Bahamian law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bahamian law. Show all posts

Friday, December 16, 2022

Securities Commission of The Commonwealth of The Bahamas Addresses Misstatements made by Mr. John J. Ray III, The Representative of the U.S. FTX debtors

Securities Commission of The Bahamas Addresses Misstatements in FTX's US Bankruptcy Case


Securities Commission of The Bahamas
Nassau, The Bahamas, Tuesday 13 December 2022 – Regrettably, the Securities Commission of The Bahamas must once again correct key misstatements made by Mr. John J. Ray III, the representative of the U.S. FTX debtors, which do not appear to be concerned with facts but rather, appear intended only to make headlines and advance questionable agendas.

To be clear, the Securities Commission of The Bahamas was the first regulator in the world to take strong, decisive action to protect the customers and creditors of FTX – regardless of where they may be located.  Every action taken by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas was in strict accordance with our country’s legislation and with orders made by the Supreme Court of The Bahamas.  These actions included securing the transfer of potentially commingled digital assets of FTX Digital Markets Ltd. and affiliates to a secure location under the authority of an Order issued by the Supreme Court of The Bahamas.  The Commission holds those assets as trustee only (under Bahamian Law), and they will be ultimately distributed, to creditors and clients of FTX, wherever they may be located, in accordance with the court’s direction.

Mr. Ray has referred to redacted email correspondence by and between Mr. Bankman-Fried and Bahamian officials.  Those redactions were designed to create a false impression of communications between Mr. Bankman-Fried and the Commission.  These redactions are disturbing as Mr. Ray is aware that the full email reveals Mr. Bankman-Fried’s acknowledgement that he had “not briefed the Securities Commission.”  The Commission has previously addressed improper distributions to Bahamian citizens in its statement dated 12 November 2022.  The Commission reaffirms its prior statement and notes that to the extent improper distributions were made to Bahamian citizens, such distributions will be subject to the appropriate claw back actions under the law.

The Commission also finds it disturbing that, either deliberately or through ignorance, Mr. Ray’s filings and communications continue to wrongfully confuse as one, the actions of the Government of The Bahamas, the Securities Commission of The Bahamas and the Court Appointed/Court Supervised Joint Provisional Liquidators. 

The Securities Commission continues to conduct a comprehensive and diligent investigation into the causes of FTX’s failure, working in cooperation with law enforcement and regulatory authorities both in The Bahamas and other jurisdictions.  The Securities Commission will make all appropriate findings and recommendations, in the appropriate forum, at the conclusion of its investigation.  Persons who are found to have engaged in misconduct will be held accountable in accordance with Bahamian law.  Unfortunately,  it has been necessary for the Securities Commission to make a request to Mr. Ray’s representatives to not obstruct that investigation.

Mr. Ray has not once reached out to the Securities Commission to discuss any of his concerns before airing them publicly.  He, however, has been informed, by letter dated 7 December 2022 to his counsel, that –  “… to the extent the Commission is able to assist in the efficient and mutually respectful conduct of the several pending proceedings without impairing the conduct or confidentiality of its ongoing regulatory investigation, including by participating in a meeting with your clients [i.e. FTX US Debtors represented by Mr. John J. Ray III], the Joint Provisional Liquidators and/or their respective counsel, they [i.e. the Commission] are prepared to do so.  An appropriate and necessary part of any arrangement reached during such meeting, would be your clients’ assurance that they will take no further action to interfere with the Commission’s investigation and other regulatory measures.”

(Emphasis Added). 

Mr. Ray has not responded to the Commission to date. 


Editor’s Information:


1. The Securities Commission of The Bahamas (the Commission) is a statutory body established in 1995 pursuant to the Securities Board Act, 1995.  That Act has since been repealed and replaced by new legislation.

2. The Commission’s mandate is defined in the Securities Industry Act, 2011 (SIA, 2011).

3. The Commission is responsible for the administration of the SIA, 2011 and the Investment Funds Act, 2019 (IFA), which provides for the supervision and regulation of the activities of the investment funds, securities and capital markets.

4. The Commission is responsible for the administration of the Financial and Corporate Service Providers Act, 2020.

5. The Commission is responsible for the administration of the Digital Assets and Registered Exchanges Act, 2020.

6. The Commission is responsible for the administration of the Carbon Credit Trading Act, 2022.

7. The functions of the Commission are to: advise the Minister on all matters relating to the capital markets and its participants;

  •  maintain surveillance over the capital markets and ensure orderly, fair and equitable dealings in securities;
  •  foster timely, accurate, fair and efficient disclosure of information to the investing public and the capital markets;
  •  protect the integrity of the capital markets against any abuses arising from financial crime, market misconduct and other unfair and improper practices;
  •  promote an understanding by the public of the capital markets and its participants and the benefits, risks, and liabilities associated with investing;
  •  create and promote conditions that facilitate the orderly development of the capital markets; and
  •  perform any other function conferred or imposed on it by securities laws or Parliament (SIA, 2011, s.12).

Monday, July 9, 2012

Sam Haven - a senior Bahamian banker has questioned whether complying with the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) could breach The Bahamas' financial services laws ...and expressed concerns that institutions could be “caught between a rock and a hard place”




FATCA


Senior Banker Queries If Fatca 'Breaches The Law'




By NEIL HARTNELL
Tribune Business Editor
nhartnell@tribunemedia.net


A senior Bahamian banker has questioned whether complying with the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) could breach this nation’s financial services laws, and expressed concerns that institutions could be “caught between a rock and a hard place”.

Sam Haven, a private banker for more than 40 years, suggested that the Government and financial services regulators needed to become more involved in determining how best The Bahamas meet FATCA’s demands, and whether any changes to this nation’s laws were necessary.

Emphasising that he was not speaking for his employer, Scotiabank (Bahamas), and that his personal views were not those of the bank, Mr Haven said FATCA was set to impose “lots of duress” on jurisdictions such as the Bahamas.

Outlining his main concern, he told Tribune Business that the US legislation, which seeks to make Bahamian financial services institutions and providers ‘tax agents’ of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), seemed to require them to breach client confidentiality provisions enshrined in laws such as the Banks and Trust Companies Regulation Act.

“Would complying with the provisions of FATCA put us in breach of confidentiality laws as set out in the Banks and Trust Companies Regulation Act,” Mr Haven questioned.

“I think we’re missing the boat on a number of things here.   There are views I personally have on this, and that is that the regulators need to give comments and instructions to financial services companies.

“At present, under the requirements of this Act, anyone complying with it would be in breach of the laws of the Bahamas.”

Mr Haven said that while Bahamian law did permit the disclosure of client information in 
“certain circumstances”, usually via the court process, FATCA required the “automatic” provision of such details to the IRS.

Given the implications for Bahamian financial services providers, Mr Haven said both the Attorney General’s Office and regulators, such as the Central Bank of the Bahamas, needed to become more involved in determining how this nation responded.

“What FATCA attempts to do is make all financial institutions reporting agents of the IRS,” Mr Haven told Tribune Business.

“The important thing for us is to have the regulators and government enter into the negotiations to decide how best to implement this, and make sure changes are made to our laws to accommodate this if we decide this is the way we want to go......

“Certainly, the Government and legislators now need to step forward.  The Central Banks needs to propose some guidelines for the Government was to whether we change the laws to facilitate this, otherwise institutions will be caught between a rock and a hard place.

“I’m not sure what the solution is at this point, but there are persons in position to steer it and give guidance on how it should be done.

“The fact is we’re getting a lot closer, and nothing seems to be happening. FATCA is saying you automatically release the information, which creates issues for institutions, as they are potentially breaching the Banks and Trust Companies Regulation Act and client confidentiality.”

Bahamian and other global financial services providers are required to reach Foreign Financial Institution (FFI) agreements with the IRS by July 1, 2013, next year for the purpose of supplying them with details on all their US clients. Otherwise, these clients will be subject to a 30 per cent withholding penalty on all US-sourced income.

Mr Haven said several Bahamian financial services firms had been talking about the action/systems they were implementing to meet FATCA’s requirements, but this was all based on what the IRS was demanding.

He warned that should the Government enter the process and make changes, these firms might “need to start over again”, with all the time and extra expense that would incur.

“The Bahamas, for a long time, has held its head high as a major player, not only in financial services but in implementing and enforcing standards around the world, such as Know Your Customer (KYC),” Mr Haven said.

FATCA, though, went further than any previous international or extra-territorial initiatives, and “creates a situation involving a lot of duress for jurisdictions like ourselves.

“The cost of implementing what they’re proposing is going to be exorbitant and enormous,” Mr Haven added.

FATCA seeks information on anyone who has even the slightest US nexus, connection, and holds bank accounts outside the US.  This means that Bahamians who hold dual US citizenship or are green card holders will have to be reported to the IRS.

This is one of the major challenges for Bahamas-based financial institutions, especially the commercial banks.  They will now have to drill down into all existing clients and investment structures to determine whether there is any US ownership that needs to be reported.  And the information sought from new clients on account opening forms will also have to be changed to determine any US connection.

Mr Haven told Tribune Business that the US “power and might” would be virtually impossible to resist, especially given the need for all banks to access the US financial and capital markets systems.

Then there were the correspondent banking relationships that have to be maintained with US institutions, especially for dealing in US dollars, along with associated clearing and settlement.

Mr Haven said it was unclear how correspondent banking relationships would be impacted if FFI agreements were not reached by the IRS deadline.

While FATCA potentially placed “a very serious burden” on the Bahamian financial services industry, he added that it was “not necessarily as onerous as you think”, given that the sector had already done much work on KYC and due diligence when it came to new accounts.

July 09, 2012

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Bahamas: State Minister for Social Services Loretta Butler-Turner laments opposition to proposed marital rape law by those it would assist

By Keva Lightbourne ~ Guardian Senior Reporter ~ kdl@nasguard.com:



State Minister for Social Services Loretta Butler-Turner said yesterday that unfortunately some of the people the proposed marital rape law was designed to assist were among those individuals who spoke out against it.

"It really was an opportunity for the women of The Bahamas and the people of The Bahamas to support something very progressive to bring further empowerment to our people," the minister told The Nassau Guardian.

"Unfortunately it appears that the people it was going to help the most were equally as vocal against it, and those persons do not wish to see progress," Minister Butler-Turner said.

Her statement came hours before the House of Assembly was prorogued, wiping clean its legislative agenda. Up to press time yesterday Minister Butler-Turner had no idea whether the proposed amendment to the Sexual Offences Act, which would have outlawed marital rape in the country, would be re-introduced to Parliament during the next session.

"It has to definitely be determined by the Government of The Bahamas. That has to be a Cabinet decision. From a personal stand point it is something that I would like to certainly see become law," said Minister Butler-Turner.

Furthermore, she had no idea whether the bill would be placed on the table again for further discussion.

But Butler-Turner said she would continue to push for the bill to become law.

"One of the challenges that I try to overcome each day is certainly bringing greater empowerment to not just women but ensuring people everywhere are on an equal footing. As I sit as vice-president of the American Commission on Women it is imperative that I continue to fight for equality for all persons. So yeah, it is something that I will continue to agitate for," the minister said.

She added that she was encouraged by those who came out in support of the legislation, especially the churches.

I was extremely encouraged by groupings of men, groupings of women but in the end analysis I cannot say that I was ecstatic over the reception we received in certain quarters.

"But there were very, very encouraging signs from important sectors of our society, but even that does not militate against the fact that I do not think we had a unanimously overwhelming clear consensus on the matter," she explained.

The amendment would mean that a spouse could be sentenced to up to life in prison for the rape of a spouse, even on a first offense, as is the case for others convicted of rape. The current Bahamian law permitting forms of marital rape stands in opposition to the United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women. The U.N. has advised that The Bahamas should eliminate the prohibition against spousal rape.

In an earlier interview with The Nassau Guardian, Director of The Crisis Centre Dr. Sandra Dean-Patterson appealed to the government not to let this amendment die.

She said it would be disappointing if the proposed ban is not re-introduced after Parliament is prorogued.

"I would say that the violence in our country must be of such concern and worry to all of us. It is a threat to The Bahamas with this senseless killing that is taking place of men in particular, and in the new year we have to come together as political parties, individuals, civic organizations, trade unions [and] churches to confront violence in all of its manifestations," Dean-Patterson said.

March 24, 2010

thenassauguardian